The Battle of Processors: Intel Meteor Lake vs. AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

With the upcoming launch of Intel’s Meteor Lake architecture, the tech community is buzzing with excitement. Leaked benchmark scores on the 3DMark Time Spy test indicate that Intel’s Core 7 Ultra 155H might give AMD’s Ryzen Z1 Extreme a run for its money in the handheld gaming device market. In this article, we will delve into the leaked information, compare the benchmark results, and discuss the implications for both Intel and AMD.

According to screenshots shared on X/Twitter by well-known leaker HXL, the Core 7 Ultra 155H achieved a Time Spy result of 3,339. This result comprises a graphics score of 3,077 and a CPU score of 6,465. To put these numbers into perspective, I ran the same benchmark on the Asus ROG Ally, which utilizes AMD’s Ryzen Z1 Extreme APU. The Asus handheld achieved an overall score of 3,150, with a graphics score of 2,834 and a CPU score of 8,574 while running in its 30W Turbo mode.

Comparing the CPU performance, the Ryzen Z1 Extreme outperformed Intel’s Core 7 Ultra 155H with a 33% better CPU score. This difference can be attributed to the Z1 Extreme’s eight Zen 4 cores. However, it is worth noting that if the Time Spy test is primarily utilizing Intel’s Meteor Lake P-cores, this difference is expected. To understand the full story, additional information about clock speeds and core utilization during the tests is required.

Graphics Performance Comparison

When it comes to graphics performance, the Core 7 Ultra 155H managed to keep up with the Radeon 780M in the Ryzen Z1 Extreme, at least in the Time Spy test. Intel’s Arc GPUs have had a reputation for delivering mixed gaming performance, particularly in older DirectX 9 and 10 games. However, recent driver releases have significantly closed the performance gap between synthetic benchmarks and actual gameplay.

In terms of Cinebench R23 results, the Core 7 Ultra 155H scored 11,616 for multicore and 1,483 for single core. In comparison, the ROG Ally achieved a multicore score of 13,896 and a single core score of 1,717. AMD’s Ryzen Z1 Extreme showcased a 14 to 16% performance advantage over Intel’s chip in this test.

While the benchmark results show some differences in performance between the Intel and AMD offerings, it is important to consider the broader implications. The Core 7 Ultra 155H, with its 28W power limit, proves to be a viable candidate for handheld gaming PCs. In this segment, graphics power often takes precedence over raw CPU performance. If Intel can offer Meteor Lake processors at a competitive price point, it could pave the way for new handheld PCs in 2024 that feature Intel processors.

Competition Benefits Consumers

Competition in any market segment is beneficial for consumers. The rivalry between Intel and AMD fuels innovation and drives manufacturers to deliver better products at competitive prices. Emdoor, for example, has already shown interest in utilizing Intel’s Meteor Lake processors for handheld gaming devices. As a newcomer to the handheld gaming world, I’m eagerly anticipating the next wave of pocket PCs and the enhanced gaming experiences they will offer.

The leaked benchmark scores for Intel’s Core 7 Ultra 155H indicate that Intel’s Meteor Lake architecture might pose a strong challenge to AMD’s Ryzen Z1 Extreme in the handheld gaming device market. While there are differences in CPU and graphics performance, the performance gap can be attributed to architecture variations and core utilization. It remains to be seen how Intel and AMD will compete in terms of pricing and availability, but regardless of the outcome, consumers can expect exciting advancements in handheld gaming PCs in the near future.


Articles You May Like

Revolutionary Changes Coming to Siri with iOS 18
A Closer Look at Life is Strange: Double Exposure
The Exciting World of Mina The Hollower
The Departure of the Philippou Brothers from the Street Fighter Film: What It Means for the Project

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *